Home » Linnea

Crossing the Aisles – A Cross Post

Posted by Linnea on 11 Mar 2009 | Tagged as: Books, Chit Chat

Categories: Books , Chit Chat | 1 Comment
(WARNING: Deadline brain still in full force)
(NOTE: This blog previously appeared in the Alien Romances Blog)
I never gave any thought to genre when I was a child. Hell, I really never gave a whole lot of thought to genre until I signed a contract with my agent. But looking back at over half a century of being an avid reader, I know my reading choices were affected by several parameters—the least of which was a genre. 

My choices as a child were limited by 1) what my mother brought home 2) what was in the local Five-&-Dime (and for those of you scratching your heads, ask—I am giving away my age here…) 3) what I had to read in school and 4) what was available from the Scholastic Book Club that month (also part of school). I had Golden Books (remember those? They’re still around). I read stories about talking rabbits and talking cats and talking butterflies. Was I reading fantasy? Damned if I know. I was reading a colorful book with hard cardboard covers and a gold foil spine. I was having fun. I was being pulled out of my me-ness and my world and into Someplace Else in my imagination.

I also had several large books of fairy tales, which I assume my parents or some relative bought. There was the usual Mother Goose stuff but there were also Aesop’s stories, and then one book that I remember treasuring that had to be someone’s original ideas. Thinking back, they had an almost Narnia quality to them but they weren’t the Narnia books. There was one tale of a clothes cabinet in an attic, and the little girl in the story could use it for all sorts of adventures (I’m thinking a mirror was involved). I remember one of the stories involved a pair of red shoes (Mary Jane style from the illustration that I can still—vaguely—see to this day). The other involved a dress she wore in a print of multi-colored pom-poms. I craved that dress. There was something about that particular dress and its colors, but what and how and why are all long since gone from my mind.

So perhaps I read adventure? Thriller? With a fantasy sub-plot?

In school Dick and Jane were always doing something. Was that general literary fiction? A precursor of Oprah meets Dr. Phil? Then when I was nine or ten my mother subscribed to Reader’s Digest Condensed Classics For Children, and every few months a nice big fat volume came in the mail. For me. Oh, joy. Oh, rapture. I fell in love with The Scarlet Pimpernel. I solved crimes with Sherlock Holmes.

I wouldn’t know a genre if it bit me in the behind.

At the end of every school year, the local library had a book sale, with the children’s books all on long tables. I was in heaven. I had my dollar which meant I could buy ten books, and I grabbed them based on cover images, title. Genre? No clue. “Does this look like fun?” was my only parameter.

I read The Hobbit in eighth grade. Not because I was browsing the fantasy section but because everyone else was reading The Hobbit. I never asked myself if I like fantasy or whether I’d find stories about not-quite-human creatures believable. “Suspension of disbelief” had no meaning to me. After all, I’d cut my reading teeth on fairy tales. Reading about ogres and witches and fairies and talking mice and flying cats had opened my mind long ago.

I read for the sheer joy of the experience. Opening the first page of a book signaled to my mind an immediate shut off of here and now, of reality as I knew it. Even when I was a pre-teen and read You Have To Draw The Line Somewhere—a YA novel before such were labeled so—about a high school girl deciding between a regular college and an art school. No unreality in that but it was still not MY life or MY school or MY decision. So it required a shut off of here and now, which I gladly did. (If you think it’s amazing that I remember the title of a book I read when I was twelve, then you don’t understand the depth of my love affair with the printed word.)

I didn’t give one thought to whether or not I liked the genre.

Rather, the one common denominator in all that I read—once I could make my own choices—was “does this problem or situation sound interesting?” In essence, conflict. In essence, to quote Blake Snyder, I was interested in “it’s all about a guy who…” Whether the guy was a prince, a doctor, a magician or a high school student mattered not one bit.

In my twenties and later, I did a lot of book buying at the grocery store where, for the most part, there’s no genre separation. Oh, there’s a little, with romance books on the left of the long display and some science fiction and fantasy in a row at the bottom. Or vice versa. But as people read the back cover blurbs and replace them, the books just get put back…somewhere. So I chose much as I had a decade before at the school library sale—what looks like fun?

I first read Melissa Scott because I found her Five Twelfths of Heaven in a bin in K-Mart.

I found Sherrilyn Kenyon’s A Pirate of Her Own (writing as Kinley MacGregor) in a bin in TJ Maxx (or it might have been Beall’s Outlet…).

I found Austin Tappan Wright’s Islandia…I don’t know where. I only remember reading it in college so possibly it was on a rack in the IU bookstore.

I didn’t read back then with one eye tracking whether or not the author fulfilled the conventions of the genre. I read because it was all about a gal or guy who… and it wasn’t where or who I was.

It never occurred to me to read—or not read—a certain genre because it wasn’t cool or it wasn’t something a female would read or it wasn’t highly regarded by this-or-that person.

I read because for a couple hundred pages, I wasn’t me.

So why do you read? What did you read as a child and has that impacted what you read now?

And do you quiver with excitement over a bin full of mixed books in a bargain store…or do you need your genres properly cordoned off on shelves?

Inquiring minds want to know. ~Linnea

Linnea Sinclair
// Interstellar Adventure Infused with Romance//
Available Now from Bantam: Hope’s Folly
http://www.linneasinclair.com/



HOPE’S FOLLY hits the shelves 2/24: strictly BSP

Posted by Linnea on 11 Feb 2009 | Tagged as: Chit Chat

Categories: Chit Chat | No Comments

This was an unexpected book. Admiral Philip Guthrie was a secondary character in Gabriel’s Ghost (RITA-award winner) and more than a bit of an antagonist. In Shades of Dark–as one reviewer noted–he began to “sport some hero duds.” But even then, I had no idea he’d get his own book.

But did he ever! And wow, he turned out so…yummy! Which just goes to prove that author’s don’t know their characters as well as they think they do.

And reviewers:

Hope’s Folly … is a rapid-fire romp through futuristic political intrigue and high-risk passion… The tug of war between decorum and passion keeps the romantic intrigue smoldering…. With Hope’s Folly, Linnea Sinclair builds on a secure reputation as a leading fashioner of science fiction romance. She straddles and blends these genres with a unique bravura and wit.” –Philip K. Jason, PhD, Naples (FL) Press Club 

“Ms. Sinclair shares her phenomenal writing talent with a well-built sci-fi world, and characters who charm their way right into the reader’s heart. Hope, fear and longing play heavy roles in Hope’s Folly as a crew struggles to survive, and an uncertain attraction progresses into a romance that sizzles.”  –Darque Reviews
http://darquereviews.blogspot.com/2008/12/review-hopes-folly-by-linnea-sinclair.html 

“If you’re a fan of science fiction and romance, this book does both equally well and in spades. Due to it standing well on its own, I would even say it’s a great book to start off a first encounter with her work, and most definitely the perfect way for more seasoned Sinclair readers to continue. This is classic Sinclair; evidence that the author knows no bounds and readily takes us readers on one imaginative and thrilling ride after another. Truly an excellent book. Five Scoops!”  –Lurv A La Mode
http://lurvalamode.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/arc-review-hopes-folly/ 

“Hope’s Folly is simply phenomenal. I absolutely did not want to put the story down. It had action, suspense, mystery, and passion.” — Kathy Andrico – KathysReviewCorner.com 
http://www.kathysreviewcorner.com/reviews/SinclairLinnea/SinclairHopesFolly.html 

“Once again Linnea Sinclair delivers. Hope’s Folly is the perfect combination of an action-packed sci-fi space romp and a heart-warming romance. A keeper.” –The Book Smugglers 
http://thebooksmugglers.com/2008/12/smugglivus-muy-special-book-review.html 

Romantic Time BOOKreviews magazine named Hope’s Folly an RT TOP PICK and gives it its highest rating of 4-1/2 stars:

“Hang on to your phasers as Sinclair blasts off on another rip-roaring space adventure. In previous books, Admiral Philip Guthrie has been an aloof legend, but in this page-turner he’s grappling with overwhelming odds. The technical details Sinclair provides add to the intensity of the story by keeping readers in the belly of the wounded ship along with its intrepid crew. A roller-coaster ride in the extreme! “ 

Please check out the book video on my site: http://www.linneasinclair.com/books.html  (click on VIEW TRAILER).

And oh yes, of course, there’s a cat in the book…

~Linnea
www.linneasinclair.com

 

From RITA Award-winning author Linnea Sinclair comes a high-stakes interstellar adventure infused with thrilling romance. 

HOPE’S FOLLY
It’s an impossible mission on a derelict ship called HOPE’S FOLLY. A man who feels he can’t love. A woman who believes she’s unlovable.
And an enemy who will stop at nothing to crush them both.

Admiral Philip Guthrie is in an unprecedented position: on the wrong end of the law, leading a rag-tag band of rebels against the oppressive Imperial forces. Or would be, if he can get his command ship—the derelict cruiser called Hope’s Folly—functioning. Not much can rattle Philip’s legendary cool—but the woman who helps him foil an assassination attempt on Kirro Station will. She’s the daughter of his best friend and first commander—a man who died while under Philip’s command, and whose death is on Philip’s conscience.

Rya Bennton has been in love with Philip Guthrie since she was a girl. But can her childhood fantasies survive an encounter with the hardened man, and newly-minted rebel leader, once she learns the truth about her father’s death? Or will her passion for revenge put not only their hearts but their lives at risk?  

          Mass Market Paperback: 560 pages
·         Publisher: Bantam Spectra (February 24, 2009)
·         Language: English
·         ISBN-10: 0553592181
·         ISBN-13: 978-0553592184




Oops!

Posted by Linnea on 10 Dec 2008 | Tagged as: Chit Chat

Categories: Chit Chat | 1 Comment

Yikes, I hit publish instead of save–I’m a day early with this. Sorry! ~Linnea, who should know better than to multi-task when uploading blogs…




Jurassic Passions: A Look at Characters and Motivation

Posted by Linnea on 10 Dec 2008 | Tagged as: Craft, Writing Life

Categories: Craft , Writing Life | 1 Comment

(this blog was originally published as part of my monthly column, The Full Sass, in Futures magazine, 2001)

A dinosaur came into my classroom last week, courtesy of one of my students, Celia. Now, let me make clear right up front that I teach “Investigative Methodology For Writers” online, so that at best, the dinosaur was an E-mail-osaurus Rex.

     But he was a useful bugger and I’m glad Celia brought him in. I’ll tell you why.

     He was a motivated dinosaur. I named him Celia’s Jurassic Passion.

     The class was discussing ‘motives’ and the dinosaur was an example Celia used to illustrate a fictional character’s hobby: “A passion so intense that his thinking is temporarily turned off.”

     Passion. Habit. Achilles’ Heel. Motive. In this particular example, this character is tricked into revealing his true identity because of his fascination with dinosaurs. He couldn’t stay away from a specific exhibit. This one last shred of his real self gives him away.

     Fiction, you say?

     Naw. Really happens.

     One of the interesting things about a character, or a person’s, motivations is that it’s often a key issue both in fiction writing and investigative work. It’s life imitating art, and art imitating life.

     In the case of Celia’s Jurassic Passion, we have a unique flavor of motive that works well for a PI and damned beautifully for a writer. It’s that one unattainable goal that drives a writer’s protagonist or antagonist. That hones a conflict line. That keeps a reader turning pages (or clicking the mouse, if it’s an e-book).

     For the PI, it’s the road sign saying: He Went Thataway.

     In any really good PI work, a PI has to climb deeply into the psyche of subject of the investigation. She has to do more than find out the facts. She has to understand what motivated the subject to lie, to steal, to philander, to connive, to run. She has to know what drives him, and what drives him is called motivation.

     And it has to be something strong enough, deep enough, to make him go against the norm. To take the risk. To take it all with him or, conversely, leave it all behind.

     In an effort not to violate the dictums of “believable characters”, many writers seem to choose mundane motivations. One hundred per cent plausible, believable motivations. A drunk driver mows down Alphonse’s granny in the middle of Main Street, so Alphonse goes on a rampage against all drunk drivers.

     But after ten-plus years as a private investigator, I can tell you that it’s not the logic or the believability of the motive that is the crux, but the intensity. I have seen people take actions for some remarkably stupid reasons, in my estimation.

     But to them, those reasons were everything. Their own Jurassic Passion.

     Intensity is what fuels the motive. Because the motives are, for the most part, as instinctual and primal as, well, a dinosaur, living deep in the very beginnings of our psyche. And often just a beastly.

     Many writers develop only lofty, altruistic and logical motives for their characters in the belief that the noble goal is universally understood. In my humble estimation, those writers are missing out on one of the most fascinating elements of the human psyche. Our ability to defy reason, ignore logic, damn the torpedoes and go full speed ahead because we are so blindsided by our passions we can see no other way of responding.

     Give me Grieving Alphonse who isn’t raging against drunk drivers but against television weather reporters. For it was the TV weather report that made Granny leave her humble home that day, and cross the street to buy an umbrella. The drunk driver is simply, in Alphonse’s primally passionate mind, a bit player.

     As a reader, a passionately illogical motive gives me the better hook, the better twist, the bigger surprise factor when all is finally revealed on the last page.

     It also, whether I like it or not, draws me into a shared identity with the character. We all have our Jurassic Passions buried somewhere inside. And motives stem from our passions. The one thing we cannot live with. The one thing we cannot live without.

     As an investigator, I sought out motives as my pinpoint flashlight on a roadmap through the winding, bumpy terrain of misinformation. As a writer, you can develop a character’s motives and passions as a pinpoint flashlight to zig and zag your reader over a similar emotional terrain.

     It’s been said that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. It’s only fitting, then, that the guy driving the bus to hell is none other than E-mail-osaurus Rex, your friendly and illogical Jurassic Passion.

~Linnea

www.linneasinclair.com

Linnea Sinclair
RITA award winning Science Fiction Romance
Bantam 2007-2008: Games of Command, The Down Home Zombie Blues, Shades of Dark
2009: Hope’s Folly




Re-Covering

Posted by Linnea on 11 Nov 2008 | Tagged as: Books, Promotion, Publishing, Writing Life

Nope, nothing about being sick. Nothing about upholstery. This month my topic is book covers and, in my case, the re-issuance of my backlist with new cover art. Cover art specifically designed for romance readers.

I write science fiction romance and initially Bantam shelved me in science fiction. That meant–to their art department–that my covers required someone with a weapon and some kind of spaceship or space station in the background on my covers. When Bantam decided to move me over to the romance aisles, they felt new cover art–”rebranding” is what they called it–was required.

They felt they needed to acheive and/or address three things:

1) The covers had to have a clear image of romance

2) The covers had to have a clear image of science fiction

3) The covers had to be uniform in appearance so as to create a “Linnea Sinclair” brand.

This turned out to be far more difficult than we thought. For one thing, the art department’s idea of romance trended toward erotica (headless women in plunging leather bustiers, fishnet stockings and spike heels being caressed by headless men with naked torsos and very tight pants). I don’t write erotica and my agent and I both held firm in our stand that to put something of that level of enticement on my covers when it’s not also between the pages would inevitably create reader-disconnect. Not to mention reader-annoyance.

No one in any of my books wears spike heels or leather bustiers (I write mostly military settings–those kinds of outfits would be beyond ludicrous on a starship.)

We settled on disembodied heads (all those headless covers create a plethora of leftover heads, I’m guessing) usually against some kind of starfield or planet with a possible spaceship or three thrown in.

For the most part, I think they came out pretty dang good.

As for the branding part, they did two things: they put my name in large font and they used a monochromatic color scheme. (I’m a little concerned we will eventually run out of colors, especially when they tried to hit me up with hot pink for my February 2009 release, Hope’s Folly. I do not write hot pink. Do. Not.)

While I think the colors and font certainly create a brand, I’m also concerned it may create the feel of “series” where not all the books are. Gabriel’s Ghost and Shades of Dark are books #1 and #2 in the Dock Five universe. Hope’s Folly is book #3 but can stand alone. The rest are all stand alones but I fear that is something that may cause confusion.

Not that there’s much I can do about it. And they are eye-catching, which is a huge plus.

You can check them out here in a short promo video or browse them below. (It appears this version of WordPress doesn’t permit video embedding… or I’d have done so.)

 fk116.jpggg116.jpgag116.jpggoc116.jpg

The re-branded books were supposed to hit the shelves in August but in reality are just now being unpacked at most bookstores and making it to the shelves. So in your wanderings, should you see them, do drop me a note and let me know your opinions. You should be able to find them not only in romance but in end-caps in Borders and B&N.

dhzb-116.jpgshades116.jpgfolly116.jpg

~Linnea

www.linneasinclair.com

//interstellar adventure infused with romance//




© 2006 RWA® Online
All content on this site is owned by RWA Online and the authors that post here.
Authorization to link to this site is granted (and encouraged).