<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Discarded Bathwater Dilemma: Plagiarism and Signet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/</link>
	<description>Where Happily Ever After is Always on the Menu!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:00:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: garmin forerunner 305 gps heart rate trainer</title>
		<link>http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/comment-page-1/#comment-25478</link>
		<dc:creator>garmin forerunner 305 gps heart rate trainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/#comment-25478</guid>
		<description>[...] &quot;resetting garmin 305&quot;: garmin forerunner 405 gps review, garmin forerunner 405 problems, garmin forerunner 305 owners manual   трамолин нейро амилоидоз кагоцел      http://lidazzbrenarin.tk       [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;resetting garmin 305&quot;: garmin forerunner 405 gps review, garmin forerunner 405 problems, garmin forerunner 305 owners manual   трамолин нейро амилоидоз кагоцел      <a href="http://lidazzbrenarin.tk" rel="nofollow">http://lidazzbrenarin.tk</a>       [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Please Don&#8217;t Feed the Writer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Plagiarism vs. Research</title>
		<link>http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/comment-page-1/#comment-23891</link>
		<dc:creator>Please Don&#8217;t Feed the Writer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Plagiarism vs. Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/#comment-23891</guid>
		<description>[...] The debates will rage on for some time, I&#8217;m sure. Some writers will continue to claim that their readers would never know the difference.  Some will overreact, which Linnea of HEA Cafe warns us against. Some will shrug and move on.  You can bet that this situation won&#8217;t be forgotten quickly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The debates will rage on for some time, I&#8217;m sure. Some writers will continue to claim that their readers would never know the difference.  Some will overreact, which Linnea of HEA Cafe warns us against. Some will shrug and move on.  You can bet that this situation won&#8217;t be forgotten quickly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/comment-page-1/#comment-23820</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/#comment-23820</guid>
		<description>Good posts. I&#039;ve been appalled by the ignorance of both readers and supposedly professional writers regarding how Signet, or any publisher, should respond to unproven charges of plagiarism. First off, Signet would have been risking a lawsuit, not to mention violating the ethics of publisher-author relations, to issue a blanket condemnation of an author whose work a) hasn&#039;t yet been studied by copyright experts and b)whose &quot;plagiarism&quot; may not violate her contract terms IF she used out-of-copyright or Fair Use materials. These are not small issues and had Signet ignored them to give a knee-jerk reaction that made ignorant readers (and authors) happy, Signet would have been in the wrong. In the same instance, RWA was absolutely correct to issue a &quot;wait until the evidence is in&quot; statement, because plagiarism is a thorny thicket of copyright technicalities, and Ms. Edwards may well be cleared of most, if not all, actionable claims. Whether you like what she did or not, whether copying verbatim is bad writing, (it is) the fact is that copying does not always equal illegal action. What this tempest mainly showed was just how little most people know about copyright law. And how savage they are in their ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good posts. I&#8217;ve been appalled by the ignorance of both readers and supposedly professional writers regarding how Signet, or any publisher, should respond to unproven charges of plagiarism. First off, Signet would have been risking a lawsuit, not to mention violating the ethics of publisher-author relations, to issue a blanket condemnation of an author whose work a) hasn&#8217;t yet been studied by copyright experts and b)whose &#8220;plagiarism&#8221; may not violate her contract terms IF she used out-of-copyright or Fair Use materials. These are not small issues and had Signet ignored them to give a knee-jerk reaction that made ignorant readers (and authors) happy, Signet would have been in the wrong. In the same instance, RWA was absolutely correct to issue a &#8220;wait until the evidence is in&#8221; statement, because plagiarism is a thorny thicket of copyright technicalities, and Ms. Edwards may well be cleared of most, if not all, actionable claims. Whether you like what she did or not, whether copying verbatim is bad writing, (it is) the fact is that copying does not always equal illegal action. What this tempest mainly showed was just how little most people know about copyright law. And how savage they are in their ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/comment-page-1/#comment-23776</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/#comment-23776</guid>
		<description>First off...While Nora and Cassie share the  same parent publisher...Penguin Putnam...they don&#039;t share the same publisher (if that makes sense) as Cassie writes for Signet and  Nora writes for Berkley Jove. Berkley/Jove/Penguin/Putnam are completely different companies. Saying that tho, Linnea is right on about not lumping everyone into the same basket.

Let&#039;s say, for arguments sake, that Cassie IS guilty (I beleive we are innocent till proven guilty so am holding judgement for a bit longer), one rotten apple doesn&#039;t mean the whole bunch is rotten too. I ask everyone to please not judge all Signet authors, or all historical authors, or better yet, all romance authors as if we all are guilty of plagiarism.

And yes...authors are in no way responsible if their covers don&#039;t jive with their stories. Blame marketing LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off&#8230;While Nora and Cassie share the  same parent publisher&#8230;Penguin Putnam&#8230;they don&#8217;t share the same publisher (if that makes sense) as Cassie writes for Signet and  Nora writes for Berkley Jove. Berkley/Jove/Penguin/Putnam are completely different companies. Saying that tho, Linnea is right on about not lumping everyone into the same basket.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say, for arguments sake, that Cassie IS guilty (I beleive we are innocent till proven guilty so am holding judgement for a bit longer), one rotten apple doesn&#8217;t mean the whole bunch is rotten too. I ask everyone to please not judge all Signet authors, or all historical authors, or better yet, all romance authors as if we all are guilty of plagiarism.</p>
<p>And yes&#8230;authors are in no way responsible if their covers don&#8217;t jive with their stories. Blame marketing LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Pearce</title>
		<link>http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/comment-page-1/#comment-23775</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/pubbedauthors/2008/01/11/the-discarded-bathwater-dilemma-plagiarism-and-signet/#comment-23775</guid>
		<description>I must respectfully disagree with you on one point, Linnea-all teenagers are lazy.
Well all the ones in my house are :)

Otherwise you&#039;re right on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must respectfully disagree with you on one point, Linnea-all teenagers are lazy.<br />
Well all the ones in my house are <img src='http://www.rwaonlinechapter.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Otherwise you&#8217;re right on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

